800x600 1024x768 Navigation:    Home arrow arrow arrow
Effects of Continuous versus Cyclic Oral Contraception: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PDF Print E-mail
Related Articles

Effects of Continuous versus Cyclic Oral Contraception: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Dec 4;

Authors: Legro RS, Pauli JG, Kunselman AR, Meadows JW, Kesner JS, Zaino RJ, Demers LM, Gnatuk CL, Dodson WC

Context Continuous oral contraception may better suppress the ovary and endometrium, lending itself to the treatment of other medical conditions. Objective To determine effects of continuous vs cyclic oral contraception. Design Randomized double blind trial Setting Academic medical center in Pennsylvania Patients 62 healthy women with regular menses Intervention Cyclic oral contraception (21d active/7d placebo given for 6 consecutive 28d cycles) versus continuous (168d of active pill) therapy using a monophasic pill (20 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 1 mg norethindrone actetate). Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome was vaginal bleeding, secondary outcomes included hormonal, pelvic ultrasound, quality of life and safety measures Results There was no statistically significant difference in the number of total bleeding days between groups, but moderate/heavy bleeding was significantly greater with the cyclic regimen (mean 11.0d [SD 8.5d], versus continuous 5.2d [6.8d]; P = 0.005), with both groups decreasing over time. Endogenous serum and urinary estrogens measured over 6 cycles was significantly lower (P = 0.02) in the continuous group than the cyclic group. Women in the continuous group also had a smaller ovarian volume and lead follicle size over the course of the trial by serial ultrasound exams. The Moos Menstrual Distress questionnaire showed that women on continuous therapy had less associated menstrual pain (P = 0.01) and favorable improvements in behavior (P = 0.04) during the premenstrual period. Conclusions Continuous oral contraception does not result in a reduction of bleeding days over a 168d period of observation, but provides greater suppression of the ovary and endometrium. These effects are associated with improved patient symptomatology.

PMID: 18056769 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


Read more...




Reddit!Del.icio.us!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites! title=
Comments (0)add feed
Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley


Write the displayed characters


busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Digg News Module


Powered by JoomlaDigger

MostReadCloud


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/abtrx1/public_html/modules/mod_mostread_cloud.php on line 216


Warning: natcasesort() [function.natcasesort]: The argument should be an array in /home/abtrx1/public_html/modules/mod_mostread_cloud.php on line 239

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/abtrx1/public_html/modules/mod_mostread_cloud.php on line 245

Powered by MostReadCloud 1.0